Litify
MyCase
Litify is a Salesforce-based platform built for mid-to-large PI and mass-tort firms, while MyCase is an affordable, self-serve practice management tool aimed at solo and small general-practice firms.
TL;DR
- Pick Litify if you run a mid-sized or large personal injury or mass-tort firm and need a Salesforce-native platform with custom workflows (pricing is gated and requires sales contact).
- Pick MyCase if you’re a solo or small firm that wants transparent, published per-seat pricing starting at $39/seat/month annually and a general-practice feature set.
- Core tradeoff: enterprise customization and vertical depth (Litify) vs. predictable low-cost SaaS with published tiers (MyCase).
Side by side
| Dimension | Litify | MyCase |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2010 |
| HQ | New York, NY | San Diego, CA |
| Target firm sizes | Mid, Large | Solo, Small |
| Practice areas | PI, Mass Tort | General |
| Starting price (lowest tier, monthly) | Not disclosed (gated) | $49/seat (monthly) or $39/seat (annual) |
| Gated pricing | Yes | No |
| Integrations listed | 0 | 0 |
Pricing
MyCase publishes three tiers on its pricing page:
- Basic, $49/seat monthly, $39/seat annual. Includes case and contact management, task management, client portal, time entry and expense tracking, billing and online payments, legal calendaring, unlimited document storage, and basic financial reporting.
- Pro, $99/seat monthly, $89/seat annual. Adds 8am IQ Legal AI, custom fields, unlimited 2-way texting, client intake management, unlimited eSignature, advanced billing, and integrations (Google, Outlook, and more).
- Advanced, $119/seat monthly, $109/seat annual. Adds MyCase Drive, full text search, 8am IQ case assistant, advanced document automation, split billing, and open API access.
Litify does not publish tier pricing. Its pricing page is gated, requiring prospects to contact sales for a quote. Based on the JSON, there are no tier numbers, no per-seat figures, and no historical snapshots to reference. Buyers should expect an enterprise sales motion with custom quotes likely tied to seat count, modules, and Salesforce licensing.
If budget transparency is a procurement requirement, MyCase is the only option between these two that discloses pricing publicly.
When to pick Litify
Litify is purpose-built for firms in its practice-area focus: personal injury and mass tort. The target firm sizes in the JSON are mid and large, which aligns with its Salesforce-native architecture, typically a fit for firms that already have or can support a platform administrator, want deep custom object modeling, and need to integrate with broader Salesforce ecosystems (marketing cloud, experience cloud, analytics).
Choose Litify if:
- You run a PI or mass-tort practice where case intake volume, referral tracking, lien management, and settlement workflows are central.
- Your firm is in the mid-to-large bracket and can absorb an enterprise procurement cycle and gated pricing.
- You want a platform that can be heavily customized by an internal ops team rather than a fixed SaaS feature set.
When to pick MyCase
MyCase targets solo and small firms with a general-practice feature set, and it publishes its pricing openly. That combination makes it a straightforward choice for firms that want to buy, onboard, and use a system without an enterprise sales process.
Choose MyCase if:
- You’re a solo practitioner or small firm wanting predictable per-seat pricing, starting at $39/seat/month on annual billing.
- Your practice is general or mixed, rather than exclusively PI/mass tort.
- You want built-in billing, online payments, client portal, and legal calendaring in the base tier without add-on modules.
Integrations and ecosystem
Neither JSON lists specific integration partners, so a like-for-like count isn’t possible from this data. That said, the two products sit in very different ecosystems by design:
- Litify is built on the Salesforce platform, which means it inherits access to the Salesforce AppExchange and the broader Salesforce integration model (APIs, Flow, custom objects). This is a major structural advantage for firms that want to connect case management to marketing, BI, and custom apps.
- MyCase advertises integrations starting at the Pro tier, specifically calling out Google and Outlook, and opens up API access at the Advanced tier. This is a more typical small-firm SaaS pattern.
Buyers should verify current integration lists on each vendor’s site before making a decision, since the JSON here does not enumerate them.
Historical pricing context
MyCase has limited but useful pricing history in the JSON. In January 2022, the product was sold as a single “MyCase” tier at $49/month per seat. By March 2022, the pricing page introduced a “Basic” tier at $39/month per seat, effectively a tier rename and repricing at the entry point. Today, Basic lists at $49/seat monthly ($39/seat annual), which suggests the $39 figure has shifted from being the headline monthly rate to the annual-commitment rate over the 2022-2026 window. In practical terms, the effective entry price is stable for firms willing to commit annually and modestly higher for month-to-month buyers.
Litify has no pricing history in the JSON because its pricing is gated. There is no way to track trajectory from public data.
Citations
Pricing sourced from vendor pricing pages on 2026-04-24. Historical data from Wayback Machine.
- Litify pricing page: https://www.litify.com/pricing/ (last scraped 2026-04-24, gated)
- MyCase pricing page: https://www.mycase.com/pricing/ (last scraped 2026-04-24)
- MyCase historical snapshots: Wayback Machine (2022-01-20, 2022-03-20)
Side by side
Litify vs. MyCase| Criterion | Litify | MyCase |
|---|---|---|
| Priced from | × Pricing on request | ✓ From $39/user/mo |
| Our score | × 1.5 / 10 | ✓ 6.5 / 10 |
| Target firm size | ✓ mid, large | × solo, small |
| Practice areas | × pi, mass-tort | ✓ general, family, ip, criminal, bankruptcy, real-estate |
| Tier count | × 0 tiers | ✓ 3 tiers |
| Pricing transparency | × Gated - contact sales | ✓ Published rate card |
| IOLTA / trust accounting | ✓ Not published | × Not published |
| Pricing model | × Per-quote | ✓ Per-seat/month |
| Annual vs monthly | × - | ✓ Annual and monthly |
| Practice area breadth | × 2 areas | ✓ 6 areas |
| Firm size coverage | ✓ 2 segments | × 2 segments |
| Founded | × 2016 | ✓ 2010 |
| HQ | × New York, NY | ✓ San Diego, CA |