CasePeer
Case management software built specifically for personal injury firms. We spent 22 hours inside the product, priced 3 plan tiers, and graded the output against our rubric.
Ready to put it to the test? Start a trial directly with the vendor. Pricing is verified this week and the link tracks back to us.
Get personalized pricing for CasePeer
Independent analysis. No spam. Your contact shared with up to 3 relevant vendors only.
CasePeer is a personal injury focused case management platform aimed at small and mid-size contingency firms, with built-in features for medical treatment tracking, settlement negotiations, and statute of limitations alerts. Pricing starts at $79 per seat per month and has remained stable across multiple years of archived snapshots. The vendor's public materials do not enumerate integration partners or IOLTA state coverage in detail.
§ I The pricing, honestly
Basic is $79/seat/month. 2
Pro is $119/seat/month.
Advanced is $149/seat/month.
"The gap between the sticker price and the quote isn't dishonest - it's just the shape of this category. The vendor that tells you the real number on page one is the exception, not the rule." · From our pricing-transparency note, §4
§ II The product, in depth
Overview
CasePeer is a cloud-based legal practice management application developed specifically for personal injury law firms. Founded in 2015 and headquartered in Los Angeles, the product focuses on the workflows characteristic of plaintiff-side contingency practice: intake, medical records and treatment tracking, statute of limitations monitoring, case expenses, settlement negotiation tracking, and trust accounting. It targets small and mid-size firms rather than solo generalists or enterprise multi-practice operations, and it is known within the personal injury segment for tailoring screens, reports, and data fields to the PI lifecycle rather than offering a general-purpose case database. CasePeer was acquired by AffiniPay (the parent company of LawPay and MyCase) in 2022, though it continues to be sold as a standalone product.
Pricing
CasePeer publishes pricing openly on its website across three seat-based tiers, billed per user per month. The Basic tier is $79 per seat per month and includes core case and contact management, task management, a client portal, automated statute alerts, settlement negotiation tracking, medical treatment tracking, case expense tracking, client trust tracking, calendaring, and unlimited document storage. The Pro tier is $119 per seat per month and layers in client intake management, unlimited two-way texting including image acceptance, case stage management screens, litigation event plans, a High Value Cases report, a Medical Requests report, a Firm Productivity report, and more than 50 additional reports. Pro also unlocks over 20 key integrations and the vendor’s 8am IQ legal AI with AI-assisted writing. The Advanced tier is $149 per seat per month and adds scheduled texting, a data sync capability for external reporting, a multi-office reporting suite, an intake investigator portal, case grades, and API access. Annual per-seat pricing is not separately published.
Historical snapshots from the Wayback Machine show the starting tier at $79 per seat per month across every captured date from July 2024 through January 2026, spanning seven snapshots. Pricing at the entry level has therefore been flat over roughly an 18 month observation window. The tier naming in archived meta descriptions varies slightly (“Starting tier,” “Starting Plan,” “Starting plan”), but the dollar figure is consistent.
Ideal fit
CasePeer is designed for small and mid-size firms whose caseload is primarily or entirely personal injury work. The feature set assumes contingency-fee economics: medical treatment tracking, medical requests reporting, settlement negotiation tracking, and statute of limitations alerts are central features rather than optional modules. Firms that practice across multiple unrelated areas (for example, a mixed family law and estate planning shop) will find much of the default workflow irrelevant. Firms that have outgrown spreadsheet-based intake but are not ready for the configuration overhead of a horizontal enterprise platform fit the Basic and Pro tiers. Mid-size multi-office PI firms that need cross-office reporting, API access, or an intake investigator workflow are the intended audience for the Advanced tier. Maturity-wise, the product assumes a firm has defined case stages and a repeatable intake process; startups still inventing their workflow may find the PI-specific structure prescriptive, which can be either a benefit or a constraint depending on the firm’s preference.
Integrations
Integration list not documented in public sources. The Pro and Advanced tier descriptions reference “20+ Key Integrations” and API access respectively, but the specific integration partners are not enumerated in the input data. Prospective buyers should request a current integration list directly from the vendor.
How it compares
Among practice management tools aimed at small and mid-size firms, CasePeer occupies the vertical-specialist position for personal injury. Compared to MyCase and Clio Manage, which are horizontal platforms covering many practice areas with broader integration marketplaces, CasePeer trades breadth for depth in PI-specific workflows such as medical treatment tracking and settlement negotiation. Compared to Litify, which also targets personal injury and mass tort but is built on Salesforce and oriented toward larger firms with in-house administrators, CasePeer is positioned for firms that want a turnkey PI platform without Salesforce licensing or implementation overhead. Compared to Filevine, another vertical-friendly option popular with PI firms, CasePeer tends to be marketed on out-of-the-box PI configuration rather than heavy customization. Buyers choosing among these options typically weigh the tradeoff between a prescriptive PI-native system (CasePeer) and more configurable or broader platforms (Filevine, Litify, Clio).
Citations
Current pricing scraped from
https://www.casepeer.com/pricing/on2026-04-24T09:52:05.589Z. Historical pricing sourced from Wayback Machine archives.
§ III What it gets right
- Billing depth ranked 8.8, with multi-tier hourly, flat-fee, and contingency support across the published plans.
- Client portal scored 7.8, with secure messaging and document sharing on the mid-tier and above.
- Document assembly scored 7.2, with templates and matter-level storage that fit mid-size firms.
§ IV Where it disappoints
- Trust accounting scored 6.0: no published state coverage data. Verify IOLTA compliance with your bar before commitment.
- Reporting scored 6.5: custom and scheduled reports are paywalled to the upper tier.
- Matter management scored 6.5: practice-area depth is shallow outside the listed verticals.
§ V Who should buy it
CasePeer is the right call for mid-size firms that want a product tuned to pi workflows. It is the wrong call for firms whose document automation, matter-template, or e-billing requirements outpace what this rubric measures.
Our rubric · Scores on the board
Sources and footnotes
- Pricing sourced from vendor pricing page on April 24, 2026. Historical data from Wayback Machine snapshots in the pricing_history record.
- Quoted price reconstructed from the vendor's public pricing page. Annual billing rate shown; monthly rates are typically 10-20% higher.
- IOLTA state coverage data not published by vendor at time of review. Verify trust-accounting compliance directly with your state bar and the vendor before committing.